As per the request of a friend of mine. In AP Government, I've been analyzing, in detail, the presidency as an office, and the individuals who have held it. Adding into this my AP History course, I've learned a lot about a lot of presidents and their actions in office. As such, here is a list of my worst US Presidents. It's not based on my politics, or on my religion, it's based on what they did in office. (If it was my politics, Obama would be number 1 on that first list.) I'll post a list of my top ten best US Presidents at a later date.
TOP TEN WORST US PRESIDENTS
1. FDR
Ok, this guy was the most scummy guy you can find. He flouted the Constitution and manipulated a good deal of the public into accepting his openly Socialist agenda. He didn't get us out of the Depression, his Federal intervention just made it worse. He also regulated the press and the radio to stop his opponents being able to make known any opposing opinions, so that history seems to tell us everyone liked him. He extended the scope of Presidential authority so far outside the Constitutional limits that he should have been impeached, except he had the full Democratic (IE, Progressive Democratic) party at his back and he wasn't afraid to use it as a club. He bullied the Supreme Court, even threatening a justice with arrest for "treason" because the justice didn't agree with his position. FDR was nothing short of an evil scumbag, and definitely deserves number 1 on this list.
2. Woodrow Wilson
Again, Wilson flouted the Constitution openly, with an "ends justify the means" mentality and the schizophrenic belief that "God has ordained me for this office. All that I do is the Lord's will." He censored the press, had people locked up for disagreeing with him, and flouted the will of the people. Under the Espionage and Sedition Act, and Act that makes the Patriot Act seem mild, he allowed Federal Investigators to raid, beat, and imprison anyone who was "treacherous" IE, who disagreed with him. Also, the way he intervened in Mexico made what Bush did in Iraq look absolutely brilliant and moral. Add into this the fact that, in a presidential speech, he endorsed the KKK, and you have it clinched.
3. Abraham Lincoln
Lincoln was one of America's first tyrants. As with the two I placed above him, Lincoln ignored the restrictions imposed on the Executive branch with the mentality that "The ends justify the means." While slavery was an issue that started the Civil War, Lincoln never freed the slaves in the North. Four northern slave states to whom the Emancipation Proclamation did not apply. Going against the will of the people (As the South was about 1/2 the population at the time) and the Supreme Court's verdicts, Lincoln forced the issue of slavery. I'm not defending Slavery, but nor will I defend Lincoln's atrocities in managing the war including; the institution of the draft, the suspension of Habeus Corpus, and the institution of Concentration Camps that resembled something out of Nazi Germany. He was a tyrant and a horrible president.
4. Theodore Roosevelt
Roosevelt was a nice guy as a person. Ok, yes, he was a little insane, but he wasn't a self obsessed maniac like his cousin. However, as a president, Teddy was atrocious. He was a war monger and an imperialist. The Panama Canal was paid for by us instigating a revolution against Colombia when they wouldn't sell us the land we wanted. Teddy also increased our imperialist regime in Haiti, Cuba, and the Phillipines to a level that resembled the British Empire.
5. Lyndon B. Johnson
Johnson was a castrated FDR. He wanted to implement socialist policies, he just didn't have the force of will to make people obey them. His "Great Society" utterly failed, and was nothing but more socialist policies paid in tax dollars and given to those who do didn't deserve them. It's not the taxpayer's job to pay for someone else's welfare. We're still paying for this schmuck's policies, and the backdoor deals he made, including the ones that kept us in Vietnam.
6. Ulysses S. Grant
Grant was, like Teddy Roosevelt, a decent man. Plagued by propaganda campaigns from the South (from which the idea that he was an alcoholic arose) he felt threatened from the very beginning of his presidency. Not made to be a politician, his foolish choices regarding his cabinet ended up screwing the South over big time in the Reconstruction. He was incredibly ineffectual, and so many atrocities happened both to the South and in the South, that I would consider him one of the worst US Presidents.
7. Jimmy Carter
If you want to talk about an ineffective President, look at Carter. Now, I could talk about what a major league pain in the ass he's been since his presidency, but seeing as technically he wasn't in office when he did that, I'll just review what the "baby-faced Baptist" did in office. For starters, he kissed the Palestinians' ass so much that he made the situation in Israel a powder keg. Carter just had no idea what to do regarding foreign policy, and it showed. He talked when he ought to have fought, and bowed when he ought to have resisted. His ass-kissing towards the Soviet Union was sickening, his domestic spending was atrocious. He was without a doubt the most ineffectual president we've had since US Grant.
8. Barack Obama
"It's too early?" Bull. His pushing for healthcare, the most blatantly unconstitutional bit of legislation since the New Deal, earns him a place on this list. He's doubled the government spending of Bush. Bush screwed up again and again in his presidency, there's no doubt, but at least Iraq was constitutionally acceptable by previous interpretation. After William McKinley's presidency, it became legal (although stupidly so) for the President as Commander in Chief to deploy troops, and Congress would have to approve within 60 days for it to be considered a war. Whatever your feelings on Iraq, it was handled Constitutionally (although not as constitutionally as I'd like.) Healthcare is SO anti-constitutional, blatantly anti-constitutional, that the Founders are probably spinning in their graves at such a velocity that we could use the motion as a source of power.
9. William McKinley
I don't think we've had a president, besides Jimmy Carter, who spewed out as much pseudo-Christian bollocks while justifying stupid actions while in office. McKinley's foreign policy was even worse than Carter, and he'd have Carter's place on the list if he hadn't been better at regulating domestic policy. The Spanish American war, and the subsequent occupations of Cuba and the Phillipines were McKinley's brilliant ideas. He felt that God wanted us (well, you, I'm half Jewish and thus subservient in the minds of such men) to extend a hand to the "racially inferior" and "disadvantaged" and show them the "light of Christianity" at rifle point. He bowed to the will of the people when they wanted the Spanish American war, had us interfere in foreign affairs that weren't ours, and basically made a complete ass of himself, earning him number 9 on this list.
10. Andrew Johnson
Lincoln at least was a powerful tyrant. Johnson was a putz. He was completely ineffectual, and simultaneously screwed over the Northern and the Southern states when Reconstruction began to be enacted. Adding into this his refusal to heed the will of Congress, and his shenanigans to get them to agree with him after they overrode his vetoes, has me place him as the 10th worse president.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I've understood that if Lincoln hadn't been reelected, we would have been stuck with McClellan, a terrible general who would have been a worse president.
ReplyDeleteIt's not that you're wrong, but more than just how the presidents treated the constitution should be used to judge them.
So God gave us a bad president, not a worse one. Lincoln was an evil scum bag. And the Constitution is the standard for judging a president, it's what they're sworn to uphold.
ReplyDeleteYou write this as if these Presidents did nothing but horrible things during their terms in office--no president is all bad or all good, they were all flawed in some way. To provide a list seemingly based on their supposedly worst decisions and actions, and to decide which actions were the worst by often reverting ridiculous political talking points and propaganda ("Socialist agenda," "...something out of Nazi Germany," etc), makes for, frankly, an unconvincing argument.
ReplyDeleteYou're inconsistent, too. I agree with texasellipses, your main criteria for judging a president's actions seem to be based around how the president treated or used the Constitution. You use that as your excuse (as it seems) for why George W. Bush doesn't make the list, seeing as he and his administration only lied about the reasons for going into Iraq and didn't push it through without Congress's consent. I suppose sending several thousand US soldiers to fight and die in a war that didn't need to be fought isn't as bad as pushing socialist agendas designed to take away the freedoms of the American people.
But then you use Wilson's open racism (Truman was, too, you know, and so was Jefferson---but I guess dropping the atomic bomb twice isn't up for debate at all here, since it was CLEARLY the right thing to do); Grant's and Carter's inability to accomplish things; and Teddy's "insanity" and warmongering as additional criteria. You wanna use personal defects as part of argument against a president? Then you better apply it evenly across the board. Warren G. Harding was a gambler and crook, why isn't he on the list? Bush jr. was a warmonger, why isn't he on the list? Andrew Jackson makes it, but only because he was a tyrant? Why not also because of his intense racism towards the Native Americans that he relocated?
So really, don't try and pretend this isn't based a good deal on your own personal politics, because your opinion is clearly biased throughout this entire post. You want someone to read your post and come out thought-provoked, rather than just provoked? Take the objective look at each president, rather than just skimming for the key words (socialism, concentration camps, warmongering, etc). And don't use obviously inflammatory and juvenile language ("scumbag," "putz," "Bull," "schmuck," etc, etc) in a post like this, maybe people will take you seriously.
somebody's annoyed.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, I think the Constitution is the major reason for a president being good or bad. Bush sucked really badly, and so did Clinton, but they weren't terribly anti-constitutional or inefficient so they're not on the list. As for "Wars that don't need to be fought," Woodrow Wilson is at the top of the list for that then, as he insisted in pissing the Germans off again and again and again until they attacked us, giving him an excuse to enter WWI. As for Wilson's racism, there's a difference between Jackson's constitutional questionable and morally reprehensible treatment of the Cherokee and Wilson's openly endorsing the KKK and refusing to condemn lynchings against blacks. As for the language I use, every man and their dog seems to think that it's fair to talk about Bush that way, so I see no reason why it shouldn't be applied across the board. Also, personal morality doesn't enter into it. Clinton was morally reprehensible, yet I didn't put him on the list. Morality doesn't enter the office of president, the President of the United States is sworn to uphold the United States Constitution, and the men here either flouted the Constitution or were completely ineffective at enforcing it.
As for personal opinions entering into it, there's no such thing in the liberal arts, despite the ridiculous insistence of certain individuals and publications (such as Ann Coulter or the Huffington Post) as an unbiased opinion. History is relatively objective, so yes, my personal opinions entered, but not as the criterion I used, else Obama would be at the top, then FDR, Wilson, Clinton, and every other liberal scuzzball and moron who's held the office. But you'll notice I didn't do that because I used more objective criteria than just my opinions ;)
Oh, and as for skimming, I've done in-depth research on each of the presidents involved, I've taken multiple courses on Constitutional Law, Political Science, Political Philosophy, and even one on the Presidency itself, but if I put a full essay regarding my beliefs on the presidents I mentioned, it would be over 20 pages long.
ReplyDeleteI forgot to mention this, but this is nothing more than an expansion on your (previous) chat status. If you could go in-depth and show exactly HOW these presidents broke the constitution...
ReplyDelete